From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson-Homans Co. v. Henderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 24, 1983
428 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. AN-55.

March 24, 1983.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Barbara J. Paulson of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal Banker, Tampa, for appellants.

James D. Henry of Harris, Barrett Dew, St. Petersburg, for appellee.


The employer and carrier, Gibson-Homans Company and Security Insurance ("E/C") appeal the deputy commissioner's order awarding wage loss benefits based upon a finding of fifty percent wage loss. We reverse.

Theodore Henderson, Jr. ("Henderson") suffered a compensable thumb injury for which he received temporary total disability benefits until he reached maximum medical improvement, then received wage loss benefits until he began working, driving a truck, as a result of the E/C's efforts to find him a job. Henderson's job involved transporting bulk materials by truck for which he was paid $10.00 per one-way load or $20.00 for a round trip, with up to four round trips possible in an eight hour shift. Drivers worked a five-day week. Henderson was fired for being undependable, after three weeks in which he worked eleven of fifteen possible work days. The deputy commissioner found that Henderson had voluntarily limited his income by his being fired, but awarded wage loss benefits equaling one-half of Henderson's stipulated average weekly wage of $284.57 based upon a finding that Henderson was able to earn only one-half of his average weekly wage.

E/C contend that there is no competent substantial evidence ("CSE") to support the award. We agree. There is no CSE to support the finding that Henderson was able to earn only one-half of his average weekly wage. The only evidence of Henderson's earnings is of the eleven days he worked for an average of $45.00 per day or $225.00 for a five-day work week. When this figure is used to calculate Henderson's wage loss, compared to his stipulated average weekly wage of $284.57, there is a $59.57 difference. This hardly constitutes a loss of fifty percent of wages. We find that Henderson could be awarded, at most, $59.57 based upon his wage loss as shown by the evidence and remand for the deputy commissioner to enter an order awarding $59.57 per week wage loss benefits.

SHIVERS, WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gibson-Homans Co. v. Henderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 24, 1983
428 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Gibson-Homans Co. v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:GIBSON-HOMANS COMPANY AND SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 24, 1983

Citations

428 So. 2d 749 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Gibson-Homans Company v. Henderson

JOANOS, Judge. Appellants move for clarification of our prior opinion, 428 So.2d 749. Initially, we note that…