From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson Greeting Cards v. Gateway Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1973
41 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

May 15, 1973


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 22, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, and the motion to dismiss granted upon condition that defendant serve notice in writing upon plaintiff within 20 days from the date of the order entered hereon that it will accept service in Canada. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The action is for breach of a contract of carriage of merchandise from Cincinnati, Ohio, to Toronto, Canada. Plaintiff is a Canadian corporation not licensed to do business here. While the defendant may be sued here, that is not the test of whether the court should entertain the action ( Silver v. Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 N.Y.2d 356). This jurisdiction, except for the fact that defendant is amenable to process here, has no connection whatsoever with the parties or the subject matter of the suit. The defendant has agreed to appear in any action started in the proper jurisdiction. The doctrine of forum non conveniens applies ( Barry v. American Home Assur. Co., 38 A.D.2d 928, affd. 31 N.Y.2d 684).

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Markewich, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Gibson Greeting Cards v. Gateway Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 15, 1973
41 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Gibson Greeting Cards v. Gateway Transp

Case Details

Full title:GIBSON GREETING CARDS, LIMITED, DIVISION OF THE C.I.T. FINANCIAL CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 15, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

State of Oklahoma ex rel. Crawford v. LNP Realty Corp.

The defendants assert that the Oklahoma court did not have personal jurisdiction over them. "New York courts…

Satterfield v. Vstock Transfer, LLC

As noted above, the action involves the use of a New York LLC to commit fraud in New York, and therefore,…