From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-07423.

September 25, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Andrew R O'Rourke, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, to "enter into the minutes the amended complaint and TRO/Injunctions filed by [the petitioner in] May and July 2003."

M. Eugene Gibbs, Montgomery Village, Maryland, petitioner pro se.

Alice Barno, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.

Before: Miller, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Dillon, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought ( see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2007
43 A.D.3d 1164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Gibbs v. O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of M. EUGENE GIBBS, Petitioner, v. ANDREW P. O'ROURKE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 25, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 1164 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6992
841 N.Y.S.2d 797