From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibbs v. Herrera

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 19, 2023
2:21-cv-02188 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02188 TLN AC

10-19-2023

KENNETH B. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. A. HERRERA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 20, 2023, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the dismissal of this action and remanded the case for the district court to consider in the first instance documentation that plaintiff paid the filing fees prior to dismissal. ECF No. 24. This court has reviewed plaintiff's proof of payment and has updated the docket to reflect that the filing fees have been paid to allow plaintiff to proceed with this action.

A review of plaintiff's complaint indicates that it is missing the last ten pages. See ECF No. 1. This complaint was electronically filed from the prison where plaintiff was housed at the time of filing. The E-File Request form submitted by plaintiff to the prison indicates that 21 pages were scanned by prison staff. ECF No. 1 at 11. However, only thirteen pages appear on the court's docket. See ECF No. 1. These pages contain an introduction, a jurisdictional statement, and a list of the parties, but they do not contain any substantive allegations of civil rights violations committed by defendants. The court is unable to screen plaintiff's complaint absent the missing pages. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) (requiring screening of complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer). The court will vacate plaintiff's complaint as it is incomplete, but it will grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint that includes the missing pages.

The court acknowledges and emphasizes that this error is not attributable to plaintiff in any fashion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is vacated.

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint.

3. An amended complaint should contain the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled “First Amended Complaint.”

4. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Gibbs v. Herrera

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 19, 2023
2:21-cv-02188 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Gibbs v. Herrera

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH B. GIBBS, Plaintiff, v. A. HERRERA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02188 TLN AC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2023)