From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Giannattasio v. McLaren Auto.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 15, 2024
3:23-cv-00066-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-00066-WHO

07-15-2024

GABRIEL GIANNATTASIO, Plaintiff, v. MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT RE: DKT. NO. 48

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Giannattasio v. McLaren Auto.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 15, 2024
3:23-cv-00066-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Giannattasio v. McLaren Auto.

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL GIANNATTASIO, Plaintiff, v. MCLAREN AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-00066-WHO (N.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2024)