From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ghadiri v. Two Vets Inv. Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 15, 2022
SACV 22-00419-CJC(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2022)

Opinion

SACV 22-00419-CJC(JDEx)

07-15-2022

ADAM GHADIRI v. TWO VETS INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., ET AL.


PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Plaintiff filed this action on March 18, 2022. (Dkt. 1.) Defendants have not appeared. Plaintiff applied with the Clerk for entry of default on May 24, 2022. (Dkt. 14.) The application was denied because Plaintiff's proof of service was lacking required information. (Dkt. 15.) Plaintiff filed another proof of service on June 2, 2022, ostensibly in an effort to correct the noted deficiencies. (Dkt. 16.) Since then, Plaintiff has not re-applied to the Clerk for entry of default.

The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's response, which could come in the form of a renewed application for entry of default or some other explanation, is due August 1, 2022.


Summaries of

Ghadiri v. Two Vets Inv. Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 15, 2022
SACV 22-00419-CJC(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Ghadiri v. Two Vets Inv. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM GHADIRI v. TWO VETS INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 15, 2022

Citations

SACV 22-00419-CJC(JDEx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 15, 2022)