From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gessner v. Plummer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 13, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-223 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10-cv-223.

July 13, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. No. 22), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), even though the time for filing extensions was extended twice, expired on July 12, 2011, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) be, and it hereby is, granted and the Complaint herein is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Gessner v. Plummer

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Jul 13, 2011
Case No. 3:10-cv-223 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Gessner v. Plummer

Case Details

Full title:MARK E. GESSNER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF PHIL PLUMMER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jul 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10-cv-223 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Springer v. Seventh Judicial Dist. Court

In the absence of state law creating the liberty interest he claims, [the plaintiff] has no procedural due…

Schultz v. San Joaquin Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't

It is just not the case that the United States Constitution gives persons within the jurisdiction of the…