Opinion
Case No.: 2:11-cv-00981-GMN-VCF
04-30-2013
MARGIE GERRARD, Plaintiff, v. NEMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC.; DOES 1 through 100; and ROE CORPORATIONS 101 through 200; inclusive, Defendant.
John D. Jones, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff BARRON & PRUITT, LLP David Barron, Esq. Chelsea Pyasetskyy, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Neiman Marcus
DAVID L. BARRON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 0142
CHELSEA P. PYASETSKYY, ESQ.
Nevada Bar. No. 11688
BARRON & PRUITT, LLP
3890 West Ann Rd.
North Las Vegas, Nevada 89031
Telephone: 702-870-3940
Facsimile: 702-870-3950
dbarron@lvnvlaw.com
cpvasetskyy@lvnvlaw.com
Counsel for Neiman Marcus
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, that the above-entitled matter may be dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and fees. BLACK & LOBELLO ______________
John D. Jones, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BARRON & PRUITT, LLP ______________
David Barron, Esq.
Chelsea Pyasetskyy, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant Neiman Marcus
"IT IS SO ORDERED"
______________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge