From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gerow v. Yesterday's

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 2004
881 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 1D03-2818.

August 24, 2004.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims, Mily Rodriguez Powell, Judge.

Kevin G. Bennett; Grossman Goldman, P.A., Boca Raton, for Appellant.

Susan J. Arrick; Arrick, Peacock, Hodges Wiener, Miami, for Appellee.


We are asked to determine whether the amendments adopted by the 2000 Florida Legislature to section 440.20(11)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), eliminated the JCC's jurisdiction to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, or to determine the terms of such an agreement. Based on the reasoning discussed in Jacobsen v. Ross Stores Sedgwick Claims, 1D03-2868, ___ So.2d ___, 2004 WL 1877558 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 24, 2004), we conclude they do not. Because it is within the province of the JCC to determine whether a settlement agreement was reached, and if so, to establish its terms, the JCC's order to the contrary is REVERSED.

ERVIN and ALLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gerow v. Yesterday's

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 24, 2004
881 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Gerow v. Yesterday's

Case Details

Full title:Linda GEROW, as personal representative for the estate, etc., Appellant…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 24, 2004

Citations

881 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Divosta Building Corp. v. Rienzi

Based on this court's recent opinions reaffirming that it is within the province of the Judge of Compensation…

Chubb Group Ins. Co. v. Easthagen

Based on this court's recent opinions reaffirming that it is within the province of the JCC to determine…