From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry Int'l Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2012
468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1032

05-29-2012

GEOSPAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Joseph P. Titterington, Dunlap Codding, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Douglas J. Sorocco and D. Ward Hobson. Grant D. Fairbairn , Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Darren B. Schwiebert and Kurt J. Niederluecke.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 08-CV-0816.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH P. TITTERINGTON, Dunlap Codding, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS J. SOROCCO and D. WARD HOBSON.

GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN, Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were DARREN B. SCHWIEBERT and KURT J. NIEDERLUECKE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry Int'l Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 29, 2012
468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry Int'l Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GEOSPAN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

468 F. App'x 999 (Fed. Cir. 2012)