From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 19, 2020
19 CIVIL 6185 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 6185 (AJN)

11-19-2020

Christopher George, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Starbucks Corporation, Defendant


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 19, 2020, Sections 349 and 350 of the New York General Business Law prohibit deceptive practices, not (allegedly) unhygienic ones. The customers have failed to allege deceptive practices or false advertising. The Court therefore GRANTS the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 26) and dismisses all claims with prejudice.; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

November 19, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

George v. Starbucks Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 19, 2020
19 CIVIL 6185 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

George v. Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Christopher George, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Starbucks Corporation, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 6185 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)