From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. Francis

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 2:06cv3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:06cv3.

March 27, 2007


ORDER


It will be recalled that on December 15, 2006, Magistrate Judge Seibert filed his Report and Recommendation, wherein the Petitioner was directed, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within ten (10) days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed his objections on December 22, 2006.

Upon examination of the report from the Magistrate Judge, it appears to the Court that the issues raised by the Petitioner in his Petition, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, wherein Petitioner alleges that he has improperly been denied credit on his federal sentence for time served on a state sentence, and by Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment, were thoroughly considered by Magistrate Judge Seibert in his Report and Recommendation. Upon review of the Petitioner's objections, the Court finds that the Petitioner has not raised any issues that were not already throughly considered by the Magistrate Judge in his Report and Recommendation. Moreover, the Court, upon an independent de novo consideration of all matters now before it, is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation accurately reflects the law applicable to the facts and circumstances before the Court in this action. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Seibert's Report and Recommendation be, and the same hereby is, accepted in whole and that this civil action be disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ for Habeas Corpus shall be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. This Civil Action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled action shall be STRICKEN from the docket of this Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment for the Respondent. It is further

ORDERED that, if Petitioner should desire to appeal the decision of this Court, written notice of appeal must be received by the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the Judgment Order, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The $5.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal and the $450.00 docketing fee should also be submitted with the notice of appeal. In the alternative, at the time the notice of appeal is submitted, Petitioner may, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.


Summaries of

George v. Francis

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 27, 2007
Civil Action No. 2:06cv3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2007)
Case details for

George v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE, Petitioner, v. JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Mar 27, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:06cv3 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Mathison v. Morrison

Numerous federal district courts have likewise determined that a federal prison sentence cannot be deemed to…