From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

George v. Conway

United States District Court, W.D. New York
May 21, 2009
05-CV-510A (W.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2009)

Opinion

05-CV-510A.

May 21, 2009


ORDER


The above-referenced case was referred to Magistrate Judge H. Kenneth Schroeder, Jr., pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On March 25, 2009, Magistrate Judge Schroeder filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be denied and defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment be granted in its entirety.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties, and no objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Schroeder's Report and Recommendation, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied and defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety.

The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

George v. Conway

United States District Court, W.D. New York
May 21, 2009
05-CV-510A (W.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2009)
Case details for

George v. Conway

Case Details

Full title:LLEWELLYN GEORGE, Plaintiff, v. JAMES T. CONWAY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: May 21, 2009

Citations

05-CV-510A (W.D.N.Y. May. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Reeder v. Hogan

Plaintiff provided no factual support for his claim that any defendant spit or put dirt in his food, his…

Jackson v. Moochie

"[T]he Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment . . . require[s] that prisoners be…