From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentry v. Valley Fine Food Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 28, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02241-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-02241-JAM-JFM

01-28-2013

JAMIE GENTRY, AN INDIVIDUAL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly Situated. Plaintiffs, v. VALLEY FINE FOOD COMPANY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, Defendant.

MICHAEL TRACY MICHAEL E. VELARDE Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMIE GENTRY MARY E. FARRELL ERICK C. TURNER Attorneys for Defendant VALLEY FINE FOODS COMPANY, INC.


MARY E. FARRELL, SBN 172050
ERICK C. TURNER, SBN 236186
FARRELL LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Defendant
VALLEY FINE FOODS COMPANY, INC.
MICHAEL L. TRACY, ESQ., SBN 237779 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRACY
Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMIE GENTRY

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

HEARING DATES ON PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO

DISMISS/STRIKE; ORDER

Pursuant to Rule 143 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Defendant Valley Fine Foods Company, Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Jamie Gentry ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification ("Class Certification Motion") on or about October 31, 2012, which is currently scheduled for hearing on March 6, 2013.

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss/Strike ("Motion to Dismiss") on or about November 1, 2012, which is currently scheduled for hearing on March 6, 2013;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have agreed to attend mediation in an effort to resolve this lawsuit;

WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have agreed that postponing the hearing date on the Class Certification Motion and Motion to Dismiss will further the interests of judicial economy as well as the interests of the Parties;

WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Court has advised the Parties that their respective motions can be heard on June 19, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties through their respective counsel that the Class Certification Motion and the Motion to Dismiss be heard on June 19, 2013, or a date thereafter as may be convenient to the Court's schedule.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL TRACY

By:_________

MICHAEL TRACY

MICHAEL E. VELARDE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

JAMIE GENTRY

FARRELL LAW GROUP

By:_________

MARY E. FARRELL

ERICK C. TURNER

Attorneys for Defendant

VALLEY FINE FOODS COMPANY,

INC.

ORDER

Having considered the above stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________

HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gentry v. Valley Fine Food Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 28, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-02241-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Gentry v. Valley Fine Food Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMIE GENTRY, AN INDIVIDUAL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-02241-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)