Opinion
No. 16,149.
Filed March 29, 1938.
1. APPEAL — Proceedings for Transfer — Time of Taking Proceedings — When Judgment Final. — Where a motion for new trial was timely filed, the judgment did not become final, as respects time for perfecting an appeal, until that motion was ruled upon. p. 169.
2. APPEAL — Proceedings for Transfer — Appeal Bond — Approval — Requisites. — Where the court neither fixed the penalty of an appeal bond nor approved any surety at the term at which the motion for new trial was ruled upon, no term time appeal could be perfected. p. 169.
3. APPEAL — Proceedings for Transfer — Time of Taking Proceedings — Filing Appeal Bond — Effect of Approval Before Ruling on Motion for New Trial. — Where an appeal bond was filed and approved before ruling on the motion for new trial, and at a later term, when the motion was overruled, a recital that the appeal bond had theretofore been filed and approved was not a sufficient compliance with the statute respecting the time and manner of filing appeal bonds. p. 170.
4. APPEAL — Dismissal — Grounds — Failure to Perfect Timely Appeal. — Where attempted term appeal failed because the bond was not properly filed and approved and the transcript was not filed within 60 days after filing the appeal bond, and no attempt was made to perfect a vacation appeal until the time therefor had lapsed, the appeal would be dismissed. p. 170.
From Hendricks Circuit Court; Horace L. Hanna, Judge.
Action between Leslie Gentry and Nora Ragan. From a judgment for the latter, the former appealed. Appeal dismissed. By the court in banc.
Harney F. Semones and Army M. Watkins, for appellant.
Archie J. Kahl and Wiley C. Dorsett, for appellee.
This is an attempted term time appeal from a judgment rendered on July 15, 1937. On August 4, 1937, appellant filed his motion for a new trial. Before the ruling on said motion, and on August 27, 1937, during the vacation of the trial court, appellant filed what he denominated an appeal bond. Thereafter, on October 19, 1937, the court overruled appellant's motion for a new trial. The only reference to an appeal bond made by the court at the time of the ruling on this motion was the following statement: "The appeal bond having heretofore been filed and approved in this matter by the court."
Appellee has appeared specially and moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has not complied with the statute authorizing a term time appeal; nor has any notice been given as required by statute to perfect a vacation appeal.
The record discloses that the judgment of the trial court did not become final until the 19th day of October, 1937, at which time the motion for a new trial was ruled upon. Carper v. 1. Peter Burghard Stone Co. (1937), 104 Ind. App. 191, 8 N.E.2d 1020.
It is also apparent that the court did not name and approve any surety or fix the penalty of the bond during the term at which the motion for a new trial was overruled, and hence a term 2. time appeal could not be perfected. Straber v. Schmaltz (1936), 102 Ind. App. 629, 4 N.E.2d 593.
The statement of the court at the time of the ruling on the motion for a new trial that the appeal bond had theretofore been filed and approved in this cause by the 3, 4. court did not amount to a sufficient compliance with our statute defining the time and manner of perfecting a term time appeal. Furthermore, the transcript was not filed with the clerk of this court within 60 days after the appeal bond was filed, and no extension of time to file the transcript was granted.
The appellant's attempted term time appeal has failed. No attempt has been made to perfect a vacation appeal, and the time for so doing has expired. The appeal is dismissed.