Summary
In Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co. (30 Misc.3d 126 [A] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2nd, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]), the court acknowledged that the health service provider had submitted an affidavit of medical necessity for the purpose of rebutting the insurer's IME report, but rejected it because the affidavit did not "meaningfully refer to, let alone rebut, the IME reports' conclusions" (see also Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co., 30 Misc.3d 131[A] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2nd, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2012]).
Summary of this case from Am. Tr. Ins. Co. v. Gentle Care Acupuncture, P.C.Opinion
December 16, 2010.
Insurance — No-Fault Automobile Insurance — First-Party No-Fault Benefits — Reimbursement for Services Rendered by Licensed Acupuncturist.