From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gentes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 29, 2004
878 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 1D02-5180.

July 29, 2004.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County, Nikki Ann Clark, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Robert S. Friedman, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Affirmed. We find the issues raised by appellant regarding the jury instructions, admission of certain evidence, and the sufficiency of evidence are without merit. We also find the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for new trial and reinstating an order of civil commitment as a sexually violent predator based on appellant's plea agreement. See State v. Harris, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S230 (Fla. May 13, 2004); Murray v. Regier, 27 Fla. L. Weekly S1008 (Fla. Dec. 5, 2002). However, we certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified by our sister courts in Freeze v. State, 861 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), and Gray v. State, 854 So.2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003):

MAY AN INDIVIDUAL BE COMMITTED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS SERIOUS DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING HIS OR HER DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR?

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, CONCUR.


Summaries of

Gentes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 29, 2004
878 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Gentes v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD GENTES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 29, 2004

Citations

878 So. 2d 469 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Gentes v. Florida

Dist.Ct.App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 878 So. 2d 469.…

Donaldson v. State

Donaldson also claims error in the trial court's instructions to the jury on the least restrictive…