From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gensler v. Feinberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 7, 1930
232 N.W. 789 (Minn. 1930)

Opinion

No. 28,031.

November 7, 1930.

Findings for defendant sustained.

There being evidence to support the findings and order for judgment and no question of error, the decision below must be affirmed.

Plaintiffs, copartners as Plymouth Plumbing Heating Company, appealed from a judgment of the municipal court of Minneapolis, Carroll, J. in favor of defendant, doing business as Feinberg Kosher Sausage Company. Affirmed.

Sarah R. Gensler Schwartz, for appellants.

Arthur Le Sueur and Samuel J. Barr, for respondent.



In this action for goods sold and delivered and services rendered, there was a counterclaim for damages caused by the negligence of plaintiffs, and on that counterclaim, the case having been tried without a jury, there was a decision for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal from the resulting judgment.

Briefly, the evidence is that in doing the job plaintiffs opened a gas main; that gas escaped in large quantity; that plaintiffs notwithstanding used a blow torch near the leak in the main; and that an explosion resulted, causing the damage to the property of defendant which is the subject of his counterclaim. The evidence supports the findings for defendant both as to negligence and the resulting damage. There being no question of error otherwise, the judgment must be affirmed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Gensler v. Feinberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Nov 7, 1930
232 N.W. 789 (Minn. 1930)
Case details for

Gensler v. Feinberg

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR GENSLER AND ANOTHER v. M. FEINBERG

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Nov 7, 1930

Citations

232 N.W. 789 (Minn. 1930)
232 N.W. 789

Citing Cases

In re Estate Sandstrom

We conclude that the record reasonably sustains the trial court's finding that the proponent failed to…

In re Estate of Calich

A few citations will suffice for this oft-repeated rule. Church of St. Vincent De Paul v. Brannan, 97 Minn.…