From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genovese v. Roan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1956
1 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

March 14, 1956

Appeal from the Chautauqua Special Term.

Present — McCurn, P.J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.


Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The question whether appellant was "doing business" within this State, so as to be subject to service of process here, should not have been determined on the affidavits alone. On this record it is also impossible to determine whether appellant's salesman, Greck, was its "managing agent" within the meaning of section 229 of the Civil Practice Act. A hearing should be had, at which the precise nature, magnitude, and regularity of appellant's activities within this State may be shown, and the precise authority of Greck and his relationship to the appellant may be revealed. The order is reversed and the matter remitted to the Special Term for the taking of testimony as provided by section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act. All concur.


Summaries of

Genovese v. Roan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 14, 1956
1 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Genovese v. Roan

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE GENOVESE, Respondent, v. BERT ROAN, Respondent, and BRIXITE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1956

Citations

1 A.D.2d 935 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Aztec Resort Motel

To require an officer of defendant to be personally present at any such hearing would, it appears, be an…

Cohen v. Lansburger

On the record presented, and in accordance with section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act, the Special Term…