From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Baking Co. v. Ward Baking Co.

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Mar 2, 1925
4 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1925)

Opinion

No. 1715.

Submitted January 15, 1925.

Decided March 2, 1925.

Appeal from Commissioner of Patents.

Application by the Ward Baking Company for registration of trade-mark, opposed by the General Baking Company. From a decree dismissing the opposition, opposer appeals. Affirmed.

F.P. Warfield and E.W. Leavenworth, both of New York City, for appellant.

W.B. Morton, of New York City, for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and BARBER, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.


Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals dismissing appellant's opposition to the registration by appellee of the word "Warranty" as a trade-mark for bread; the ground of the opposition being appellant's use of the word "Bond" as a trade-mark on the same class of goods.

If "Bond," as used by appellant, were more than suggestive, it would be descriptive, and hence not subject to appropriation as a trade-mark. Being merely suggestive, however, it necessarily follows, as we have said many times, that the field is open to others to adopt and use suggestive marks that are not deceptively similar. An inspection of the two marks here involved clearly discloses that appellee has met this test.

The decisions of the Patent Office contain a full and satisfactory discussion of the question involved, and we therefore affirm the decision appealed from, without more.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

General Baking Co. v. Ward Baking Co.

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Mar 2, 1925
4 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1925)
Case details for

General Baking Co. v. Ward Baking Co.

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL BAKING CO. v. WARD BAKING CO

Court:Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Date published: Mar 2, 1925

Citations

4 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1925)
55 App. D.C. 228

Citing Cases

Sierra Chemical Co. v. Berettini

A trade-mark may then be suggestive of a characteristic of the product and yet be valid, but in such case the…