From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Alloy Casting v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 7, 1965
345 F.2d 794 (3d Cir. 1965)

Summary

In General Alloy, both principal and interest of the note in question were subordinated, and the corporation which received the funds began corporate life with $50,000. of equity and $450,000. of debt.

Summary of this case from Trans-Atlantic Company v. C. I. R

Opinion

No. 15165.

Argued May 20, 1965.

Decided June 7, 1965.

On Petition for Review of the Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

William W. Scott, Jr., Thorp, Reed Armstrong, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John E. Laughlin, Jr., Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Morton K. Rothschild, Dept. of Justice,

Tax Division, Washington, D.C. (Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Attys. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and STALEY and GANEY, Circuit Judges.


The record in this case warrants the Tax Court's determination that the contributions made to the taxpayer by its two principal stockholders were contributions to equity capital rather than true indebtedness. Since we perceive no error in the proceedings, the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

General Alloy Casting v. C.I.R

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 7, 1965
345 F.2d 794 (3d Cir. 1965)

In General Alloy, both principal and interest of the note in question were subordinated, and the corporation which received the funds began corporate life with $50,000. of equity and $450,000. of debt.

Summary of this case from Trans-Atlantic Company v. C. I. R
Case details for

General Alloy Casting v. C.I.R

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL ALLOY CASTING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 1965

Citations

345 F.2d 794 (3d Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Trans-Atlantic Company v. C. I. R

This court has indeed relied on these factors in the past. General Alloy Casting Co. v. Commissioner of…

Fin Hay Realty Co. v. United States

There was no restriction because of the possible excessive debt structure, for the corporation had been…