From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2006
34 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-01125.

November 21, 2006.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated December 30, 2005, as denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on their cause of action against the defendants Starr Realty Company (NE), LLC, Heartland Construction Corp., Review Avenue Construction Corp., and Heartland Land Construction Corp. alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) and, upon searching the record, awarded summary judgment to those defendants dismissing that cause of action insofar as asserted against them.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly searched the record and awarded summary judgment to the defendants third-party plaintiffs dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) insofar as asserted against them since the permanently affixed ladder from which the injured plaintiff fell was a normal appurtenance to the building and was not designed as a safety device to protect the injured plaintiff from elevation-related risks ( see Gold v NAB Constr. Corp., 288 AD2d 434; Norton v Park Plaza Owners Corp., 263 AD2d 531).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Gelo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 21, 2006
34 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Gelo v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GELO et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant, and STARR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 21, 2006

Citations

34 A.D.3d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 8736
823 N.Y.S.2d 699

Citing Cases

Szymanski v. the Argo Corp.

Although the statute is to be construed as liberally as possible in order to accomplish its protective goals…

Warrick v. THC Realty Development, L.P.

According to his testimony, the building was gutted, the walls of the closet which housed the ladder were…