From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelia v. Gelia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2014
114 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-14

Amy GELIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. David GELIA, Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O'Donnell, J.), entered November 16, 2012 in a divorce action. The order directed defendant to pay attorney's and accountant's fees of plaintiff. John P. Pieri, Buffalo, for Defendant–Appellant. Palmer, Murphy & Tripi, Buffalo (Thomas A. Palmer of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O'Donnell, J.), entered November 16, 2012 in a divorce action. The order directed defendant to pay attorney's and accountant's fees of plaintiff.
John P. Pieri, Buffalo, for Defendant–Appellant. Palmer, Murphy & Tripi, Buffalo (Thomas A. Palmer of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from an order directing him to pay counsel fees in the amount of $20,475 and accountant's fees in the amount of $11,115 as his share of such fees incurred by plaintiff in this matrimonial action. We reject defendant's contention that those awards are excessive. “The award of reasonable ... fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court” ( Morrissey v. Morrissey, 259 A.D.2d 472, 473, 686 N.Y.S.2d 71;seeDomestic Relations Law § 237[a] ). Supreme Court properly considered the parties' submissions in light of all the circumstances of the case, including the parties' relative financial circumstances and the merits of their positions during settlement negotiations, and we conclude that the awards are reasonable and do not constitute an abuse or improvident exercise of the court's discretion ( see Decker v. Decker, 91 A.D.3d 1291, 1291–1292, 938 N.Y.S.2d 690;Blake v. Blake [Appeal No. 1], 83 A.D.3d 1509, 1509, 921 N.Y.S.2d 615).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, and SCONIERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gelia v. Gelia

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2014
114 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Gelia v. Gelia

Case Details

Full title:Amy GELIA, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. David GELIA, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 1263 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 1263
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1057

Citing Cases

Dechow v. Dechow

We reject plaintiff's contention in appeal No. 2 that the court abused its discretion in awarding counsel…

Rivera v. Rivera

“The record establishes that the court appropriately considered [plaintiff's] ‘reasonable needs and…