Summary
In Van Gelder v. Van Gelder (84 N.Y. 658) it was held that "costs to the respondents" in the remittitur meant only one bill of costs for all of the respondents.
Summary of this case from Reynolds v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Opinion
Argued February 2, 1881
Decided March 8, 1881
James H. Van Gelder for appellant.
J.A. Griswold Eugene Burlingame for respondents.
DANFORTH, J., reads for reversal of order of General Term and affirmance of order of Special Term as to costs in this court, and for dismissal of appeal from order of General Term as to General Term costs.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.