Geiger v. Pfizer, Inc.

Full title: CHRIS GEIGER, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

Case No. 2:06-CV-636 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:06-CV-636.

March 30, 2009

OPINION AND ORDER

ALGENON MARBLEY, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff Chris Geiger's Motion for Reconsideration and Objections [doc. 76] to the Magistrate Judge's Order on Motion to Compel [doc. 75]. After thorough review of the objections, the court finds that the objections are without merit and hereby overrules same. The Court ADOPTS the rationale and reasoning of the Magistrate Judge's Opinion. The Magistrate Judge's Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [doc. 55] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.