Opinion
No. 3D21-0013
08-11-2021
GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Appellants, v. QUALITY DIAGNOSTIC HEALTHCARE INC., etc., Appellee.
Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, and John P. Marino, and Kristen L. Wenger, and Drew Krieger, and Lindsey R. Trowell, and Edward K. Cottrell (Jacksonville), for appellants. Christian Carrazana, P.A., and Christian Carrazana, for appellee.
Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, and John P. Marino, and Kristen L. Wenger, and Drew Krieger, and Lindsey R. Trowell, and Edward K. Cottrell (Jacksonville), for appellants.
Christian Carrazana, P.A., and Christian Carrazana, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Through these consolidated appeals, appellant, Geico Indemnity Company, challenges a series of final judgments entered in favor of appellee, Quality Diagnostic Healthcare, Inc. Geico contends the lower tribunal erred in interpreting section 672.736(1)(a)(5), Florida Statutes. Recognizing the able trial court did not have the benefit of our decision in Geico General Insurance Co. v. Beacon Healthcare Center Inc., 298 So. 3d 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) at the time judgment was rendered, we agree and reverse and remand the orders under review for further proceedings in accordance with this binding precedent.
Reversed and remanded.