From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Hallandale Beach Orthopaedic

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 30, 2021
321 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D21-209

06-30-2021

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPAEDIC a/a/o Barthel Esteni, Appellee.

Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz-Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant. David B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.


Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, Peter D. Weinstein and Adrianna de la Cruz-Muñoz of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, for appellant.

David B. Pakula of David B. Pakula, P.A., Pembroke Pines and Amir Fleischer of Marks & Fleischer, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam. Affirmed. See Geico Indem. Co. v. Muransky Chiropractic P.A. , No. 4D21-457, 323 So.3d 742 (Fla. 4th DCA June 24, 2021).

Gross, May and Damoorgian, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Hallandale Beach Orthopaedic

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jun 30, 2021
321 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

GEICO Indem. Co. v. Hallandale Beach Orthopaedic

Case Details

Full title:GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. HALLANDALE BEACH ORTHOPAEDIC a/a/o…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

321 So. 3d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)