From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geddis v. Westside Natl. Bank of West Paterson, N.J

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
106 N.J.L. 238 (N.J. 1930)

Opinion

Submitted May 31, 1929 —

Decided February 3, 1930.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the respondent, Hart Vanderwart.

For the appellant, David S. Herman.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Newman in the Circuit Court, and reported in 7 N.J. Mis. R. 245.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CASE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, JJ. 9.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, McGLENNON, KAYS, DEAR, JJ. 6.


Summaries of

Geddis v. Westside Natl. Bank of West Paterson, N.J

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 3, 1930
106 N.J.L. 238 (N.J. 1930)
Case details for

Geddis v. Westside Natl. Bank of West Paterson, N.J

Case Details

Full title:MERLE M. GEDDIS, RESPONDENT, v. WESTSIDE NATIONAL BANK OF WEST PATERSON…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 3, 1930

Citations

106 N.J.L. 238 (N.J. 1930)
148 A. 790

Citing Cases

Didlake v. Standard Ins. Co.

Since Lathrop was not the owner and was neither in possession nor control of the automobile, he could neither…

Weart v. First National Bank of Dunellen

He testified that he did not know until after that time that he was entitled to them; but he surely knew that…