From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GE Money Bank v. Haddad

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 24, 2012
817 N.W.2d 109 (Mich. 2012)

Opinion

Docket No. 145010. COA No. 306506.

2012-07-24

GE MONEY BANK, Plaintiff–Counter Defendant–Appellee, v. Constance HADDAD, Defendant–Counter Plaintiff–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration of the motion to quash subpoena and direct the transmission of the record is GRANTED. The motion to quash subpoena and direct transmission of the record is DENIED. The motion to waive fees and costs and for miscellaneous relief is DENIED; this ruling does not affect the Court's earlier waiver of the defendant's filing fee. The application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

GE Money Bank v. Haddad

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jul 24, 2012
817 N.W.2d 109 (Mich. 2012)
Case details for

GE Money Bank v. Haddad

Case Details

Full title:GE MONEY BANK, Plaintiff–Counter Defendant–Appellee, v. Constance HADDAD…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

817 N.W.2d 109 (Mich. 2012)
492 Mich. 857