From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 786 (N.C. 2014)

Opinion

No. 111P10–2.

12-18-2014

GE BETZ, INC. v. R.C. CONRAD, Robert Dodd, Benjamin Lukowski, Barry Ownings, and Zee Company, Inc.

John M. Martin, Winterville, for GE Betz, Inc. John R. Wester, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Douglas M. Jarrell, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Pearlynn G. Houck, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Stephen D. Feldman, Raleigh, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Nora F. Sullivan, Cary, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Jenna Butler, Wilmington, for GE Betz, Inc. Bradley R. Kutrow, Charlotte, for GE Betz, Inc. Victoria A. Cundiff, for GE Betz, Inc. George Rountree, III, Wilmington, for Conrad, R.C., et al. Mark R. Sigmon, Raleigh, for GE Betz, Inc. Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for GE Betz, Inc. Joshua D. Davey, Charlotte, for GE Betz, Inc.


John M. Martin, Winterville, for GE Betz, Inc.John R. Wester, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Douglas M. Jarrell, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Pearlynn G. Houck, Charlotte, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Stephen D. Feldman, Raleigh, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Nora F. Sullivan, Cary, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Jenna Butler, Wilmington, for GE Betz, Inc.

Bradley R. Kutrow, Charlotte, for GE Betz, Inc.

Victoria A. Cundiff, for GE Betz, Inc.

George Rountree, III, Wilmington, for Conrad, R.C., et al.

Mark R. Sigmon, Raleigh, for GE Betz, Inc.

Monica E. Webb, Raleigh, for GE Betz, Inc.

Joshua D. Davey, Charlotte, for GE Betz, Inc.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 30th of December 2013 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of January 2014 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of December 2014.”


Summaries of

Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 18, 2014
367 N.C. 786 (N.C. 2014)
Case details for

Ge Betz, Inc. v. Conrad

Case Details

Full title:GE BETZ, INC. v. R.C. CONRAD, Robert Dodd, Benjamin Lukowski, Barry…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 18, 2014

Citations

367 N.C. 786 (N.C. 2014)
367 N.C. 786

Citing Cases

Stull v. Stull

Moreover, Defendant-Father did not make an offer of proof demonstrating how Dr. Fine's testimony concerning…

State v. McCulloch

Failure to make such an indication is fatally deficient.... Therefore, because ... the trial court failed to…