From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

G.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 23, 2002
828 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-3972

Opinion filed October 23, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert Collins, Judge; L.T. Case No. 01-6095 DC00A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sandra Braverman, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


In finding appellant, a juvenile, guilty of the delinquent act, the trial court stated, "[b]ased on the totality of the circumstances and the credibility of the testimony, I find the defendant guilty as charged." (Emphasis added). Appellant argues that the court failed to use the proper burden of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt." However, "totality of the circumstances" is not a burden of proof, and the judge's use of that phrase does not demonstrate that he used a lesser standard, but merely considered all of the evidence and circumstances. See, e.g., Sokol v. State, 217 So.2d 843, 844 (Fla.3d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

G.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 23, 2002
828 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

G.D. v. State

Case Details

Full title:G.D., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 23, 2002

Citations

828 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)