From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gazzano v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 12, 2015
2:11-cv-00868-AC(TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, DEBORAH LEE STACHEL, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration, LYNN M. HARADA, Special Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California 94105 Attorneys for Defendant

          ROBERT C. WEEMS Attorney for Plaintiff


          STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, that Plaintiff's previously filed Motion for Fees (Docket No. 33) is hereby withdrawn.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($6, 000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO DOLLARS ($0.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).

         After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

         Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to the Robert C. Weems, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

         This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel, including the Weems Law Offices, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.

         This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

          ORDER

         PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($6, 000.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of ZERO DOLLARS ($0.00), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.


Summaries of

Gazzano v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 12, 2015
2:11-cv-00868-AC(TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Gazzano v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE DARLENE GAZZANO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 12, 2015

Citations

2:11-cv-00868-AC(TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2015)