From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gazzano v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 17, 2015
2:11-cv-00868-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney, DONNA L. CALVERT, Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, LYNN M. HARADA, Special Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant.

          ROBERT WEEMS, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), AND REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record and with the approval of the Court, that this action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

         Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to determine whether jobs exist in significant numbers in the national economy that Plaintiff can perform considering her age, education, work experience, and residual functional capacity.

         The parties further request that the Clerk of the Court be directed to enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. As noted, this stipulation constitutes a remand under the fourth sentence of Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

          ORDER

         Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gazzano v. Colvin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 17, 2015
2:11-cv-00868-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Gazzano v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE DARLENE GAZZANO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 17, 2015

Citations

2:11-cv-00868-DAD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 17, 2015)