From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayle v. Villamarin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 29, 2020
18 Civ. 6025 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)

Opinion

18 Civ. 6025 (GBD) (GWG)

09-29-2020

ITOFFEE R. GAYLE, Plaintiff, v. ANGIE VILLAMARIN, Defendant.


ORDER :

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, a United States Magistrate Judge is available to rule on dispositive motions in this case. If the parties consent to the Magistrate Judge ruling on a particular motion, no objection to the ruling would be permitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 (b)(2). Instead, the ruling would be treated as any other ruling in the case and would be reviewable to the extent the ruling would have been reviewable had it been made by a District Judge.

Exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge to make a ruling on a dispositive motion is permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent. To determine whether the parties wish to voluntarily consent to the Magistrate Judge's disposition of the motion for summary judgment (Docket # 87), defense counsel is directed to send to counsel for plaintiff on or before Octobrer 13, 2020, a copy of the attached consent form bearing either (1) a signature indicating consent to the Magistrate Judge ruling on the motion or motions identified on the form, or (2) a notation that the defendant does not consent.

On or before October 20, 2020, plaintiff's counsel is directed to file a letter either (1) stating that all parties have signed the form and attaching that form or (2) stating that all parties have not consented. If any party has not consented, the letter shall not inform the clerk which of the parties have not consented but shall merely state that there has not been consent by all parties.

This Order is not intended to interfere with the parties' right to have a trial and/or any other dispositive proceedings before a United States District Judge. The parties are free to withhold their consent without adverse substantive consequences. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent shall not be communicated to any Magistrate Judge or District Judge to whom the case has been assigned.

SO ORDERED DATED: New York, New York

September 29, 2020

/s/_________

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN

United States Magistrate Judge NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Notice of a magistrate judge's availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings and enter a final order dispositive of each motion. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may consent to have motions referred to a magistrate judge, or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.

Consent to a magistrate judge's consideration of a dispositive motion. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings and enter a final order as to each motion identified below (identify each motion by document number and title).

Motions: Motion for summary judgment (Docket #87)

Printed names of parties and attorneys

Signatures of parties or attorneys

Dates

Itoffee R. Gayle/You Zhi Theodore Chua

__________

__________

Angie Villamarin/Lance W. Shapiro

__________

__________

__________

__________

__________


Reference Order

IT IS ORDERED: The motions are referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and enter a final order on the motions identified above in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Date: __________

__________

District Judge's signature

George B. Daniels, United States District Judge

Printed name and title Note: Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.


Summaries of

Gayle v. Villamarin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 29, 2020
18 Civ. 6025 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Gayle v. Villamarin

Case Details

Full title:ITOFFEE R. GAYLE, Plaintiff, v. ANGIE VILLAMARIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 29, 2020

Citations

18 Civ. 6025 (GBD) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 29, 2020)