From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayle v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 28, 2008
275 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 07-7751, 08-6036.

Submitted: April 24, 2008.

Decided: April 28, 2008.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cv-00681-REP).

St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to toll the limitation period for filing a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gayle v. Johnson, No. 3:05-cv-00681-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2007 Dec. 18, 2007). Additionally, we deny Gayle's motion for production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Though Gayle has filed a motion for production of documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, the Act is not applicable to federal courts. 5 U.S.C. §§ 551(1)(B), 552(f)(1) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gayle v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 28, 2008
275 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Gayle v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:St. Aubyn Sebastian GAYLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene JOHNSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 28, 2008

Citations

275 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Boyce

The FOIA directs agencies of the federal government to make certain information available to the public.…

United States v. Roseboro

See United States v. Lucas, 141 F. App'x 169, 170 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). In any event, federal courts…