From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaxiola v. City of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
NO. CV 10-6632 AHM (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CV 10-6632 AHM (FMO)

09-30-2011

JORGE GAXIOLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiffs' Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to plaintiff Michael Frost; Claim Three of the Complaint and plaintiffs' claims against the Federal Transit Authority, the Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez and Peter M. Rogoff are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Claims One, Two and Nine against Malcolm Dougherty, and Claims One, Seven, Eight, Nine and Thirteen, and the § 1983 claim set forth in Claim Two against State of California, Department of Transportation are dismissed on Eleventh Amendment grounds; plaintiffs' state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; and all other claims are dismissed with prejudice.

A. HOWARD MATZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gaxiola v. City of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 30, 2011
NO. CV 10-6632 AHM (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Gaxiola v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:JORGE GAXIOLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 30, 2011

Citations

NO. CV 10-6632 AHM (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2011)