From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gavin v. Park Merced Investors Props. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
No. C 12-05864 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)

Summary

dismissing for failure to connect any of the named defendants to a legal violation

Summary of this case from Gavin v. City and County of San Francisco

Opinion

No. C 12-05864 RS

12-12-2012

LYNN GAVIN AND DOES 1-10, Plaintiffs, v. PARK MERCED INVESTORS PROPERTIES LLC, and DOES 1-149, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed an ex parte application for the return of her housing choice voucher and the personal property taken from 22 Grijalva Drive. Until defendants have been served in this matter, the Court can take no action on this application. Plaintiff is directed to refine the list of named defendants to a manageable number of those intimately associated with this action. Should plaintiff wish to seek a Temporary Restraining Order on defendants to seek such relief, she must so request and serve that request on defendants. Once service is effectuated, this matter may be considered in due course.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gavin v. Park Merced Investors Props. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Dec 12, 2012
No. C 12-05864 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)

dismissing for failure to connect any of the named defendants to a legal violation

Summary of this case from Gavin v. City and County of San Francisco
Case details for

Gavin v. Park Merced Investors Props. LLC

Case Details

Full title:LYNN GAVIN AND DOES 1-10, Plaintiffs, v. PARK MERCED INVESTORS PROPERTIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2012

Citations

No. C 12-05864 RS (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2012)

Citing Cases

Gavin v. City and County of San Francisco

at ¶¶ 99, 100; TRO Application at 12; see also Hambolu v. PCOF PM EQ, LLC, Nos. 15-cv-2780-RS and…