Opinion
88-DO-0020-15; CA A50348
Submitted on record and appellant's brief April 3, 1989
Affirmed May 10, 1989
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Crook County, Thomas M. Mosgrove, Judge.
Carl M. Dutli, Prineville, filed the brief for appellant.
No appearance for respondent.
Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.
PER CURIAM
Affirmed. No costs to either party.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment. The trial court ruled that the "property settlement agreement, dated January 19, 1988, is set aside as inequitable" and ordered husband to pay $400 per month spousal support. Husband contends that the court lacked any basis to refuse to incorporate the settlement agreement in the judgment or to impose spousal support. The record on appeal consists only of the trial court file. We cannot review those contentions on this record. Vale v. Brooks, 235 Or. 295, 384 P.2d 141 (1963).
Affirmed. No costs to either party.