From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gatesco Q.M. v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 30, 2008
No. 14-07-00714-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2008)

Opinion

No. 14-07-00714-CV

Opinion filed December 30, 2008.

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2007-00576.

Panel consists of Justices ANDERSON, FROST, and HUDSON .

Senior Justice J. HARVEY HUDSON sitting by assignment.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This is an attempted appeal from an order signed June 1, 2007. The record reflects the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

This attempted appeal is an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit. Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code § 51.014. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 28.1, an appeal from an interlocutory order is accelerated and a motion for new trial will not extend the time to perfect the appeal. Accordingly, appellant's notice of appeal was due within twenty days of June 1, 2007, the day the order was signed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b). The notice of appeal was filed August 24, 2007.

The record reflects this is not a final judgment since Bill White remains a defendant in the case below.

Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617-18. Appellant's notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3

On November 10, 2008, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court's intent to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Gatesco Q.M. v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 30, 2008
No. 14-07-00714-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Gatesco Q.M. v. City of Houston

Case Details

Full title:GATESCO Q.M., LTD. D/B/A QUAIL MEADOWS APARTMENTS, LTD., Appellant v. CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Dec 30, 2008

Citations

No. 14-07-00714-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2008)