From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gates v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2023
1:23-cv-00271-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-00271-CDB

10-06-2023

JOHNNY HOWARD GATES, Plaintiff, v. M. NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE NOTICE REGARDING EARLY ADR

(DOC. 16)

Plaintiff Johnny Howard Gates, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, brought claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant J. Alejo and F. Barrios on Eighth Amendment excessive force claims and against Defendant M. Navarro on an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim.

I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 25, 2023, this Court issued its Order Referring Case to Post-Screening ADR and Staying Case for 90 Days. (Doc. 14.) Relevant here, the parties were directed to file notice indicating whether they wished to participate in an early settlement conference within 45 days. (Id. at 2.)

On October 5, 2023, Defendants filed “Defendants' Request for an Extension of Time to Opt Out Post-Screening Alternative Dispute Resolution; Declaration of Lauren Sanchez.” (Doc. 16.) Defendants seek an extension of time within which to file “a motion to opt out of the settlement conference.” (Id. at 1.) More particularly, defense counsel declares that she has “worked to conduct a full investigation and analysis of Plaintiff's claims before the deadline to opt out of ADR,” reviewing relevant records and discussing the case with Defendant Navarro and her supervisor. (Id. at 3, ¶ 3.) Counsel declares the investigation will not be completed by October 10, 2023, because additional documents and “body-worn camera footage” has been requested of the correctional institution, but not yet received. (Id., ¶ 4.) Further, counsel has been unable to schedule and complete several interviews. (Id.) Defendants request an additional 21 days within to complete their preliminary investigation and to “file a motion to opt out of ADR, if necessary.” (Id., at ¶ 5.) Counsel declares the request is not made for any improper purpose or to cause undue delay. (Id.)

II. CONCLUSION AND ORDER

The Court notes a “motion” is not required of Defendants should they elect to opt out of ADR proceedings. Rather, Defendants need only complete and file the notice attached to this Court's August 25, 2023 Order. (See Doc. 14 at 3.)

Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' request for an extension of time within which to file notice concerning participation in early ADR is GRANTED; and

2. Defendants SHALL file such notice no later than October 31, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gates v. Navarro

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 6, 2023
1:23-cv-00271-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Gates v. Navarro

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY HOWARD GATES, Plaintiff, v. M. NAVARRO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 6, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-00271-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2023)