Gates v. Horning

Full title: GATES et al, Respondents, v. HORNING, Appellant

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 21, 1981

55 Or. App. 261 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

55 Or. App. 261

637 P.2d 940

Opinion

637 P.2d 640 (Or.App. 1981) 55 Or.App. 261 Wilker D. GATES and Jennifer D. Hagg, Respondents, v. George J. HORNING, Jr., Appellant, Margaret Horning, Defendant. No. 77-7-31; CA 19904. Court of Appeals of Oregon. December 21, 1981

       Argued and Submitted Oct. 21, 1981.

       James R. Cartwright, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

       Thomas K. Wolf, Tualatin, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.        Before RICHARDSON, P. J., and THORNTON and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

        PER CURIAM.

       The issue presented in this appeal is the meaning of the term "transfer" in a confession of judgment executed by defendant and his late wife.

       Defendant argues that the deed to his new wife did not constitute a "transfer." We disagree.

       W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. McCoy, 96 Or. 474, 190 P. 311 (1920); Hammond v. Oregon etc. R.R. Co., 117 Or. 244, 243 P. 767, cert. den. 273 U.S. 707, 47 S.Ct. 99, 71 L.Ed. 850.

       Affirmed.