From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaston v. Rothenberg

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 25, 2021
19-CV-164 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-164 (RWL)

06-25-2021

DEANNE GASTON, Plaintiff, v. TODD ROTHENBERG, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having been advised by the parties (Dkt. 93) that all claims asserted in this action have been settled in principle, it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this Order, either party may apply by letter within that period to restore the action to the calendar. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order, and any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, an order of the Court must be entered to that effect within the thirty day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). Any pending motions are moot and shall be terminated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions, vacate all remaining conference dates and other deadlines, and close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gaston v. Rothenberg

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 25, 2021
19-CV-164 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Gaston v. Rothenberg

Case Details

Full title:DEANNE GASTON, Plaintiff, v. TODD ROTHENBERG, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

19-CV-164 (RWL) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 25, 2021)