From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gastelum v. Tri-Cnty. Hosp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
21-cv-05291-VKD (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-05291-VKD

02-01-2023

FERNANDO GASTELUM, Plaintiff, v. TRI-COUNTY HOSPITALITY, Defendant.


ORDER RE COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL ORDER 56; VACATING HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 36

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Mr. Gastelum challenges accessibility barriers he claims he encountered at a hotel, the Quality Inn & Suites, allegedly owned or operated by defendant Tri-County Hospitality (“TriCounty”) in Gilroy, California. Mr. Gastelum moves to compel Tri-County's cooperation in performing a joint site inspection, as required by this District's General Order 56. Dkt. No. 36. Tri-County opposes Mr. Gastelum's motion, and advises that the joint site inspection was set to take place on January 25, 2023. Dkt. No. 37. Mr. Gastelum did not reply to Tri-County's opposition, and no party has advised the Court whether the joint site inspection did, in fact, occur on January 25, 2023.

Accordingly, the Court orders as follows:

1. The hearing previously set for February 6, 2023 is hereby vacated.

2. The parties shall file a joint status report regarding the status of the joint site inspection by February 8, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gastelum v. Tri-Cnty. Hosp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 1, 2023
21-cv-05291-VKD (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Gastelum v. Tri-Cnty. Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:FERNANDO GASTELUM, Plaintiff, v. TRI-COUNTY HOSPITALITY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 1, 2023

Citations

21-cv-05291-VKD (N.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2023)