From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gasparyan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 18, 2012
473 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 10-56946 D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03268-PJW

05-18-2012

KARAPET GASPARYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Patrick J. Walsh, Magistrate Judge, Presiding


Argued and Submitted May 7, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: NOONAN and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and MUELLER, District Judge.

The Honorable Kim Mueller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation.
--------

Petitioner Karapet Gasparyan appeals the district court's denial of his motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). We affirm.

Despite the district court's many invitations, Gasparyan failed to provide any meaningful rebuttal to the government's showing that its position was substantially justified. The district court's denial of attorney's fees thus was not an abuse of discretion. See Gutierrez v. Barnhart, 274 F.3d 1255, 1258 (2001) (explaining that the decision whether to award fees under the EAJA, including the district court's conclusion that the government's position was substantially justified, is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gasparyan v. Astrue

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 18, 2012
473 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Gasparyan v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:KARAPET GASPARYAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 18, 2012

Citations

473 F. App'x 588 (9th Cir. 2012)