Opinion
No. 10-56946 D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03268-PJW
05-18-2012
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Patrick J. Walsh, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 7, 2012
Pasadena, California
Before: NOONAN and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and MUELLER, District Judge.
The Honorable Kim Mueller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation.
--------
Petitioner Karapet Gasparyan appeals the district court's denial of his motion for attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). We affirm.
Despite the district court's many invitations, Gasparyan failed to provide any meaningful rebuttal to the government's showing that its position was substantially justified. The district court's denial of attorney's fees thus was not an abuse of discretion. See Gutierrez v. Barnhart, 274 F.3d 1255, 1258 (2001) (explaining that the decision whether to award fees under the EAJA, including the district court's conclusion that the government's position was substantially justified, is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
AFFIRMED.