Gaskin v. State

Full title: Andrew GASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Feb 13, 2019

582 S.W.3d 899 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106678

02-13-2019

Andrew GASKIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Ave. Ste. 314, Clayton, MO 63105, For Movant/Appellant. Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin L. Schriener, 141 N. Meramec Ave. Ste. 314, Clayton, MO 63105, For Movant/Appellant.

Garrick F. D. Aplin, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Gaskin ("Movant") appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding that Movant has failed to demonstrate that the motion court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing, we affirm the judgment of the motion court.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).