From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garzon v. Metropolitan Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2202.

February 23, 2010.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered March 11, 2009, insofar as it granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and denied plaintiffs' cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under section 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michelle S. Russo, Port Washington, for appellants.

Amabile Erman, P.C., Staten Island (Anthony A. Lenza, Jr. of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.


Plaintiff was struck by a caulking gun that he left temporarily on a ladder rung as he was working in a facility owned by defendants. He argues that defendants violated Labor Law § 240 (1) in that they failed to provide him with a scaffold or manlift from which to work and failed to provide a safety device to secure the caulking gun.

Labor Law § 240 (1) applies to falling object cases where the falling of an object is related to a significant risk inherent in the relative elevation at which materials and/or loads must be positioned or secured. The fact that an injured plaintiff may have been working at an elevation when an object fell is of no moment in a falling object case because a different type of hazard is involved ( see Narducci v Manhasset Bay Assoc., 96 NY2d 259, 268).

Here, the caulking gun did not fall because of the absence or inadequacy of the ladder, scaffold or manlift. Plaintiff left it on the ladder temporarily and forgot to remove it before adjusting the ladder. No evidence was presented by plaintiffs that the absence of a scaffold or lift proximately caused the accident. Thus, defendants demonstrated that plaintiff's conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident.

[Prior Case History: 22 Misc 3d 1135(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 50448(U).]


Summaries of

Garzon v. Metropolitan Transp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2010
70 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Garzon v. Metropolitan Transp

Case Details

Full title:JOSE L. GARZON et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

70 A.D.3d 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1540
895 N.Y.S.2d 83

Citing Cases

Julio v. Antonio Dev., LLC

ors and owners and their agents . . . in the erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or…

Giannini v. 56 Leonard, L.L.C.

"The statute is violated when the plaintiff is exposed to an elevation-related risk while engaged in an…