From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 17, 2005
No. 05-04-00727-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-04-00727-CR

Opinion Filed October 17, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-34392-W. Dismiss.

Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and RICHTER.


OPINION


Consuelo Flores de la Garza waived a jury trial and entered a negotiated guilty plea to delivery of cocaine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (Vernon 2003). Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court sentenced appellant to four years' imprisonment and assessed a $2500 fine. Appellant now appeals her conviction. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). After reviewing the record, we conclude we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellant plea bargained for a four-year sentence. The trial court's certification states that appellant has no right to appeal and is supported by the record. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-15 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jursidiction.


Summaries of

Garza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 17, 2005
No. 05-04-00727-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Garza v. State

Case Details

Full title:CONSUELO FLORES DE LA GARZA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

No. 05-04-00727-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 17, 2005)