From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gary K. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2018
No. 1:17-cv-00452-JR (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)

Opinion

No. 1:17-cv-00452-JR

09-27-2018

GARY K., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [21] on June 29, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court reverse and remand for an award of benefits the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB"). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation [21]. The decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for DIB is REVERSED and REMANDED for an award of benefits pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 27 day of September, 2018

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gary K. v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 27, 2018
No. 1:17-cv-00452-JR (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Gary K. v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:GARY K., Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 27, 2018

Citations

No. 1:17-cv-00452-JR (D. Or. Sep. 27, 2018)