Garvin v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Pharmacists Mut. Ins. v. Urgent Care Pharmacy

    413 F. Supp. 2d 633 (D.S.C. 2006)   Cited 2 times

    "The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the Legislature." Garvin v. South Carolina, 615 S.E.2d 451, 453 (S.C. 2005). "What a legislature says in the text of a statute is considered the best evidence of the legislative intent or will."

  2. Eagle Container v. County of Newberry

    366 S.C. 611 (S.C. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 14 times

    "The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and effectuate the intent of the Legislature." Garvin v. State, 365 S.C. 16, 21, 615 S.E.2d 451, 453 (2005); Georgia-CarolinaBail Bonds, Inc. v. County of Aiken, 354 S.C. 18, 22, 579 S.E.2d 334, 336 (Ct.App. 2003); Knotts v. S.C. Dept. of NaturalResources, 348 S.C. 1, 10, 558 S.E.2d 511, 516 (2002). "The primary purpose in construing a statute is to ascertain legislative intent."