From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garrison v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1932
164 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 18 May, 1932.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Moore, J., at October Term, 1931, of BURKE.

Avery Riddle and Mull Patton for plaintiff.

Ervin Ervin for defendant.


Civil action to recover damages for alleged breach of contract in removing spur track running from defendant's main line to plaintiff's premises in the town of Morganton, brought under authority of Parrott v. R. R., 165 N.C. 295, 81 S.E. 348.

From a judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff's evidence, he appeals, assigning errors.


The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., taking no part in the consideration or decision of the case, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed in accordance with the general practice of appellate courts, without becoming a precedent. Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N.C. 840; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N.C. 803, 157 S.E. 136.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Garrison v. R. R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1932
164 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Garrison v. R. R

Case Details

Full title:JOHN.W. GARRISON v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1932

Citations

164 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1932)
164 S.E. 924

Citing Cases

Fed. Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment stands affirmed without…